South Carolina 303(d) List of Impaired Waters & TMDLs

EPA decision to add four (4) waterbody-pollutant combinations to South Carolina’s 2020 and 2022 section 303(d) lists

The Draft 2020 and 2022 Combined 303(d) List was submitted to EPA for review and approval on September 15, 2022. Upon review, EPA partially approved and partially disapproved the 303(d) List. As stated in their decision letter received December 28, 2022:

“The EPA disapproves the state’s decision to not list WQLSs when a biological assessment of macroinvertebrates scores over a certain amount, but other readily available data indicate impairment for one or more parameters. The state’s decision is inconsistent with Section 303(d) of the CWA and the implementing regulations pursuant to 40 C.F.R § 130.7, and the EPA is identifying three WQLSs for inclusion on the List.”

The site/parameter combinations that EPA proposes adding to the state’s 303(d) List:


The State’s decision to not list these sites was based on the presence of a healthy biologic community as demonstrated by macroinvertebrate sampling at these locations. This is in accordance with both our assessment methodology (Appendix H of the Integrated Report) and SC Regulation 61-68 E. 14 d. (2) which states: “If the ambient concentration is higher than the numeric criterion for toxic pollutants, the criterion is not considered violated if biological monitoring has demonstrated that the instream indigenous biological community is not adversely impacted.” EPA acknowledges this provision in the state regulation and recommends that DHEC remove this provision during the next rulemaking. DHEC has agreed with EPA to consider removing this provision during the next water quality standards review.

EPA’s decision to include three additional sites has been made available for public comment through February 17, 2023. Details including a summary of the decision are available here:

Comments are to be submitted to the EPA contact listed at this site:

Click Here for the Water Quality Information Tool
Enhanced Version 2.0 Released December 2020
Supporting Documentation

The Water quality (WQ) information tool was developed in an effort to assist stormwater managers in the preparation of a Notice of Intent (NOI) for construction activities, coverage under the industrial stormwater general permit or other stormwater management planning. Note that this tool should be used in conjunction with the statewide list of Sites Covered Under an Approved TMDL and Corresponding WQ Attainment Status (pdf) in order to accurately determine the water quality attainment status at each monitoring location. TMDL information may be updated in the WQ information tool at any time as additional TMDL documents are approved by the USEPA.

This application brings 90 layers of the Agency's most current and comprehensive watershed and water quality information into a user-friendly, statewide application. This searchable atlas includes watershed boundaries and descriptions; Bureau of Water permits and advisories; public water supply; water quality monitoring stations and assessments; water classifications; floodplains; National Wetland Inventory; county parcels; National Land Cover Data; Municipal Separate Storm Sewers (MS4s); TMDLs; and more. Note that the Water Quality Information Tool is recommended for the purpose of completing a Notice of Intent (NOI) for construction activities or coverage under the industrial stormwater general permit.

Table of Contents:

A) Impaired Waterbodies - 303(d) List

B) Total Maximum Daily Loads

A) 303(d) List

The 303(d) list is the list of impaired waterbodies. All states are required to develop a list of waterbodies that do not meet water quality standards. This requirement comes from Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, hence the common name for the list. The waterbodies on this list do not meet water quality standards even after controls for point and nonpoint source pollution have been put in place and/or a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the pollutant has not been developed. The purpose of the list is to identify impaired waters so that the source of impairment can be described and corrective actions can be implemented to improve water quality.

EPA mandates that the 303(d) list of impaired waters be developed every two years and submitted to EPA for approval. South Carolina develops a 303(d) list every two years (1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, etc) for the waterbodies that fail to meet water quality standards.

Back to Top

How is the 303(d) List Developed?

DHEC solicits and considers all existing and readily available water quality data, including non-DHEC data, in developing South Carolina's 303(d) list. All non-DHEC data are accepted for consideration at any time during the listing cycle; however, only data submitted before September 1 of each odd-numbered year will be considered for the following year's 303(d) list (for example, data for the 2020 list must be submitted by September 1, 2019). To be considered for the 303(d) list, data must be representative of current water quality conditions and comparable to state water quality criteria. Any organization submitting data should use laboratories certified by the DHEC Office of Environmental Laboratory Certification for the test methods of record.

Persons wishing to collect water quality data for DHEC use are encouraged to contact the DHEC Office of Environmental Affairs and submit a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) for approval prior to initiating sampling. For the Department to use any non-DHEC data in development of the 303(d) list, submittal of non-DHEC data should be accompanied with an approved QAPP.

The 303(d) list is compiled using five years worth of data (e.g. for the 2020 list, data from 2014-2018 will be used). An assessment methodology is developed by DHEC and approved by EPA Region 4 and is used to assess data for 303(d) list development. This assessment methodology is included in the 303(d) document that is also approved by EPA Region 4.

If you have data that you would like DHEC to consider in developing South Carolina's 303(d) list, please e-mail Susan Waldner. Data must be submitted electronically by using the appropriate format. See Data Template (xls) for a downloadable Excel file.

How can a site be removed (or "delisted") from the 303(d) list?

Once a site has been added to the 303(d) list, there are only three ways for it to be removed or "delisted:

  1. The SC water quality standard has been attained
  2. A listing error has been identified
  3. A TMDL has been developed and approved. TMDLs must be developed and approved by EPA for all sites listed on the 303(d) list unless they are removed for one of the two reasons above. Please note that a developed and approved TMDL may not mean that the site/station has attained SC water quality standards.

Back to Top

How can I find the current and past South Carolina's 303(d) List

2018 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at:

Supplement Pb Technical Document to the 2018 303(d) List - January 2020 (pdf) 

Supplement Pb Technical Document Update to the 2018 303(d) List - October 2020 (pdf) 

The official database for the approved 2018 303(d) list is maintained by SCDHEC Bureau of Water.

SCDHEC has a priority and schedule for development of TMDLs on the 303(d) list.

Back to Top

Previous SC 303(d) Lists:

  • 2016 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2016 303(d) List (pdf)
  • 2016 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2016 305(b) Report (pdf)
  • 2014 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2014 303(d) List (pdf)
  • 2014 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2014 305(b) Report (pdf)
  • 2012 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2012 303(d) List (pdf)
  • 2012 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2012 305(b) Report (pdf)
  • 2010 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2010 303(d) List (pdf)
  • 2010 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2010 305(b) Report (pdf)
  • 2008 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2008 303(d) List (pdf)
  • 2008 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2008 305(b) Report (pdf)
  • 2006 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2006 303(d) List (pdf)
  • 2006 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2006 305(b) Report (pdf)
  • 2004 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part I: Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2004 303(d) List (pdf)
  • 2004 State of South Carolina Integrated Report Part II: Assessment and Reporting can be found at: 2004 305(b) Report
  • 2002 Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2002 303(d) List (pdf)
  • 2000 Listing of Impaired Waters can be found at: 2000 303(d) List (pdf)

Supplement to the 2000 303(d) List - January 2001 (PDF) 
Supplement concerning Enoree River (BE-017) - October 2001 (PDF) 
Supplement to the 2000 303(d) List - January 2002 (PDF)

Back to Top

What is the complete list of impaired waters in South Carolina?

A complete list of sites or stations that does not meet the state's water quality standards comprises of:

Back to Top

B) Total Maximum Daily Loads

What is a TMDL?

A TMDL, or Total Maximum Daily Load, is the amount of a single pollutant (such as bacteria, nutrients, metals) that can enter a waterbody on daily basis and still meet water quality standards set fort by the State. "TMDL" refers to both a calculation of a pollutant entering a waterbody as well as a document which includes this calculation along with a source assessments, watershed and land use information, reductions and allocations information, implementation and other relevant information, maps, figures, and pictures.

TMDLs are a requirement found in Section 303(d), of the Clean Water Act. Once a site is included on the 303(d) list of impaired waters, a TMDL must be developed within two to thirteen years of initial listing. In South Carolina, TMDLs are developed and proposed by SCDHEC and then forwarded to EPA Region 4 for final approval.

TMDLs are calculated by adding all the point and nonpoint sources for the pollutant causing the impairment. After a TMDL is calculated, the amount of load entering from point and nonpoint sources is compared to the water quality standards for that waterbody. Then this total loading is reduced to the levels where the water quality standards can be met. This reduced loading is then divided among all the point and nonpoint sources.

The goal of a TMDL is to identify potential pollution sources, calculate and quantify the reduction of those sources, and general implementation information, needed in order to meet water quality standards and improve water quality. After the approval of the TMDL, an implementation plan can be developed to realize the goals of the written TMDL document. Implementation of a TMDL has a potential to reduces sources of pollution within a watershed and a potential to restore the full use of the waterbody.

SCDHEC's TMDL Regulations (R 61-110) can be found at: TMDL Regulation

Back to Top

How are TMDLs calculated?

TMDLs are calculated as the sum of the allowable loads of a single pollutant from all contributing point and nonpoint sources and includes a margin of safety. The calculations must include a margin of safety to ensure that the waterbody can be used for purposes that have been designated. 
TMDL = j Wasteload Allocations +j Load Allocations + Margin of Safety

Wasteload allocations are loadings from point sources, such as an industrial or domestic treatment plants. Load allocations are from nonpoint sources. Examples of nonpoint sources are agricultural activities, runoff due to rainfall, etc. Allocations are determined through the review of monitoring data, load-duration curve, watershed based modeling, or other appropriate tools and methods. Margin of safety accounts for the scientific uncertainty and is incorporated into the calculation of the TMDL.

Back to Top

What are water quality classifications, standards and designated uses?

Water quality standards for South Carolina (R.61-68 and R.61-69) are promulgated by the SC General Assembly, approved by EPA,and implemented by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control.

Federal water quality standards regulations require that States and authorized Indian Tribes specify appropriate water uses to be achieved and protected. Appropriate uses are identified by taking into consideration the use and value of the waterbody for public water supply, for protection of fish, shellfish, and wildlife, and for recreational, agricultural, industrial, and navigational purposes.

In SCDHEC's water quality standards regulations, the designated uses we protect are:

  • Contact recreation (swimming or primary and boating/wading or secondary),
  • Drinking water supply,
  • Aquatic life uses, which include fishing, the survival and propagation of a balanced indigenous aquatic community (fresh and marine) of fauna and flora, shellfish harvesting, crabbing,
  • Agricultural and industrial uses,
  • All groundwaters in SC have a designated use of underground sources of drinking water.

Back to Top

Which waterbodies require a TMDL?

Waterbodies require TMDLs when the following pollution control requirements are not stringent enough to meet applicable water quality standards:

  • Technology-based effluent limitations required by the Clean Water Act;
  • More stringent effluent limitations required by either State or local authority; and
  • Other pollution control requirements (e.g., best management practices) required by local, State or Federal authority are not stringent enough to implement any water quality standard applicable to such waters.

Usually, when these requirements are not met, the site becomes listed on the 303(d) list. Hence, the Clean Water Act requires development of a TMDL for all waters included on the 303(d) list.

Back to Top

How many TMDLS are currently developed?

Over 400 sites or stations are covered under a TMDL developed in South Carolina and approved by USEPA Region 4. Approximately 350 of these approved TMDLs are for fecal coliform bacteria. See the link below for the list of current approved TMDLs in South Carolina. The complete list of sites covered under TMDLs and whether the sites are meeting water quality standard for the pollutant of concern may be helpful to prospective permittees in finding out if a waterbody is impaired.

Current list of approved SC TMDLs

Sites Covered Under an Approved TMDL and Corresponding Water Quality Attainment Status

Back to Top

What TMDLs are currently being developed in South Carolina?

SCDHEC is currently developing TMDLs for sites that are impaired for fecal coliform bacteria in fresh waters, fecal coliform bacteria in shellfish harvesting waters, and nutrients in lakes.

Current List of TMDLs Under Development by SCDHEC to view a list of areas where these TMDLs are being developed. Please click at: Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) for Impaired Waters in SC to view draft TMDLs available for public comment.

Back to Top

How are TMDLs Implemented?

After a TMDL has been approved, State and local water quality management plans should be updated and control measures implemented.

National Pollution Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) Permit limits based on TMDLs, known as water quality-based limits, must be issued for point sources, including MS4, construction, and industrial stormwater.

Nonpoint source controls may be established by implementing Best Management Practices (BMPs) through voluntary or mandatory programs for enforcement, technical assistance, financial assistance, education, training, technology transfer, and demonstration projects.

When allowing for nonpoint source controls, implementation plans should provide:

  • A reasonable assurance that the controls will be implemented and maintained OR
  • An effective monitoring program to demonstrate that nonpoint source reductions are taking place

In South Carolina, funding may be available for the implementation of TMDLs through Section 319 Grants administered by SCDHEC. These funds are only available for TMDL implementation activities not required under a permit. Learn more about the Section 319 Nonpoint Source grant program.

Back to Top

How is TMDL implementation evaluated?

Whenever a TMDL is being implemented, the following approaches are recommended as a way of evaluating the effectiveness and progress of TMDL implementation process:

  • Monitor pollutant loadings.
  • Track implementation and effectiveness of controls.
  • Assess water quality trends in the waterbody.
  • Reevaluate TMDL for attainment of water quality standards.

Back to Top

How does a TMDL implementation plan benefit citizens?

A TMDL is a road map that lets citizens know how much pollutant discharge is acceptable and reduces much of the uncertainty and ambiguity of water quality regulations. It also lets community member and regulated entities know what needs to be done inorder to improve and restore impaired water bodies. TMDLs are a valuable tool to quantify pollutant loading, identify sources and determine the actions needed to meet water quality standards and restore impaired water bodies. However, to be effective they must be implemented.

When a TMDL has been implemented, the local community becomes a better place to live because the water quality has improved. Swimming and other water-based recreation is safer, fishing is better and the water is cleaner. Landowners can take pride in addressing and solving resource issues at the local watershed level. If you are a landowner or any stakeholder interested in finding out more about TMDLs or how to implement one in your area, contact your Watershed Manager. Learn more about DHEC's watershed management efforts.

Back to Top

How should an NPDES permittee deal with a discharge to a waterbody for which there is a TMDL?

MS4 stands for the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer program, a permitting program that considers stormwater discharge from municipalities to be a point source. Operators of large, medium and regulated MS4s are required to obtain NPDES permit coverage in order to discharge pollutants into Waters of the State. These designations (large, medium, and small) are based on urbanized areas as determined by the latest census. There are also construction, industrial, and utilities stormwater discharger.

The TMDL must specify discharge conditions or requirements, generally expressed as a wasteload allocation, for all discharges, including MS4, of the pollutant of concern to the relevant waterbody. The allocation may be numeric or narrative (e.g. specific BMPS), and may take any reasonable form. The MS4 operator must incorporate the stipulated requirements into the stormwater management plan, and implement them accordingly to the maximum extent practicable. If the TMDL is subsequently revised, the operator must implement the new allocation.

Back to Top


Manager: Wade Cantrell(803) 898-3548
303(d) List and TMDL Coordinator: Susan Waldner(803) 898-2460
TMDL Project Manager: Banu Varlik(803) 898-3701
TMDL/Wasteload Allocation Project Manager: Yoichi Matsuzuru(803) 898-1545
TMDL/Wasteload Allocation Project Manager: Matt Baumann(803) 898-4249
TMDL/Wasteload Allocation Project Manager: Eric Lachenmyer(803) 898-3609
Wasteload Allocation Project Manager: Feleke Arega(803) 898-4451
Wasteload Allocation Project Manager: Erika Balogh(803) 898-3806
Wasteload Allocation Project Manager: Heather Rizzuti(803) 898-3903


Back to Top